<p class="no_name" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 1.5em; color: rgb(81, 81, 81); font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px;">
	<span style="color:#000000;">Joanna Jordan&rsquo;s petition to have the result of the children&rsquo;s referendum annulled. The&nbsp;High Court. Judgment was delivered on October 18th, 2013, by Mr Justice Paul McDermott.</span></p>
<p class="no_name" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 1.5em; color: rgb(81, 81, 81); font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px;">
	<br />
	<span style="color:#000000;"><strong>Judgement</strong><br />
	A petitioner failed to make a case on the balance of probabilities that the Government&rsquo;s unconstitutional information campaign for the Children&rsquo;s Referendum materially affected the outcome, resulting in a Yes result.</span></p>
<p class="no_name" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 1.5em; color: rgb(81, 81, 81); font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px;">
	<br />
	<span style="color:#000000;"><strong>Background</strong><br />
	Joanna Jordan&rsquo;s application was based on the ruling of the&nbsp;</span><a class="search" href="http://www.irishtimes.com/search/search-7.1213540?tag_organisation=Supreme%20Court&amp;article=true" style="color: rgb(0, 51, 153); text-decoration: none; outline: none !important;"><span style="color:#000000;">Supreme Court</span></a><span style="color:#000000;">&nbsp;in McCrystal v. Minister for Children and Youth Affairs &amp; Ors IESC 53 delivered on November 8th, 2012, and the several judgments of the court delivered on December 11th.</span></p>
<p class="no_name" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 1.5em; color: rgb(81, 81, 81); font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px;">
	<span style="color:#000000;">This established that the Government had spent &euro;1.1 million of public monies to promote a Yes vote in the children&rsquo;s referendum, in contravention of the principles established in McKenna v. An Taoiseach (No. 2) 2 I.R. 10.</span></p>
<p class="no_name" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 1.5em; color: rgb(81, 81, 81); font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px;">
	<span style="color:#000000;">Mr McCrystal had challenged the expenditure of public money on a Government information booklet, a website and radio, television and print advertising favouring a Yes vote in the referendum.</span></p>
<p class="no_name" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 1.5em; color: rgb(81, 81, 81); font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px;">
	<span style="color:#000000;">The court found the campaign constituted a clear disregard of the rights of citizens to a referendum conducted in accordance with the norms of the democratic process mandated by the Constitution.</span></p>
<p class="no_name" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 1.5em; color: rgb(81, 81, 81); font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px;">
	<span style="color:#000000;">Slogans in the Government booklet such as &ldquo;Protecting Children&rdquo; and &ldquo;Supporting Families&rdquo;, as well as visual representations of children, were found to have been designed to induce a subliminal, emotional response to advocate a Yes vote. The court granted a declaration that the various publications &ldquo;in places&rdquo; breached the principles set out in the McKenna case.</span></p>
<p class="no_name" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 1.5em; color: rgb(81, 81, 81); font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px;">
	<span style="color:#000000;">The proceedings brought by Ms Jordan concerned the effect, if any, of that unconstitutional behaviour on the poll. She submitted that the breaches were so egregious and serious in themselves that it was likely that they had an impact on the electorate and materially affected the outcome of the referendum. The Minister for Children and the Attorney General (the respondents) contended that a finding in McCrystal that aspects of the information campaign were at variance with the McKenna principles did not mean that the court had to set aside the result of the referendum.</span></p>
<p class="no_name" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 1.5em; color: rgb(81, 81, 81); font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px;">
	<br />
	<span style="color:#000000;"><strong>Decision</strong><br />
	Mr Justice McDermott referred to Mr Justice Barrington in Hanafin v. Minister for the Environment 2 I.R. 321, who said: &ldquo;This Court will not lightly set aside what appears, prima facie, to be an Act of the sovereign people. Unless, therefore, what has happened is an express and obvious constitutional abuse affecting the outcome of the Referendum, the onus of proof on the petitioner will be a heavy one.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p class="no_name" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 1.5em; color: rgb(81, 81, 81); font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px;">
	<span style="color:#000000;">Pointing to article s. 43(1) of the Referendum Act 1994, Mr Justice McDermott said Ms Jordan must demonstrate that, on the balance of probability, the unconstitutional behaviour of the Government affected &ldquo;the result of the referendum as a whole&rdquo;.</span></p>
<p class="no_name" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 1.5em; color: rgb(81, 81, 81); font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px;">
	<span style="color:#000000;">Ms Jordan procured the services of expert witnesses who testified in support of the proposition that the Government information campaign had done this.</span></p>
<p class="no_name" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 1.5em; color: rgb(81, 81, 81); font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px;">
	<span style="color:#000000;">Her witnesses included political scientist Dr&nbsp;</span><a class="search" href="http://www.irishtimes.com/search/search-7.1213540?tag_person=Michael%20Bruter&amp;article=true" style="color: rgb(0, 51, 153); text-decoration: none; outline: none !important;"><span style="color:#000000;">Michael Bruter</span></a><span style="color:#000000;">&nbsp;of the London School of Economics, British advertising expert&nbsp;Robert Heath&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>Irish Times</em>&nbsp;journalist&nbsp;John Waters.</span></p>
<p class="no_name" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 1.5em; color: rgb(81, 81, 81); font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px;">
	<span style="color:#000000;">Dr Bruter extrapolated figures from a Behaviour and Attitudes post-referendum survey, which Mr Justice McDermott accepted established some statistical correlation between receipt of the Government booklet and voting Yes. However, the judge said he was not satisfied that receiving the booklet meant the recipient was thereby caused to vote Yes.</span></p>
<p class="no_name" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 1.5em; color: rgb(81, 81, 81); font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px;">
	<span style="color:#000000;">Expert witnesses for the respondents gave evidence that that in the absence of a properly designed study implemented at the time of campaign it was not possible to come to a clear view that the unconstitutional expenditure of money by the Government resulted in victory for the Yes side that would not otherwise have occurred.</span></p>
<p class="no_name" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 1.5em; color: rgb(81, 81, 81); font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px;">
	<span style="color:#000000;">On the website, it was found that the number of unique visitors, 23,309 &ndash; less than 1 per cent of the voting population &ndash; was too small to suggest it had a material affect on the result.</span></p>
<p class="no_name" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 1.5em; color: rgb(81, 81, 81); font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px;">
	<span style="color:#000000;">Concerning the Government&rsquo;s TV, radio, and print advertising, the judge was inclined to agree with witnesses for the respondents who said it was impossible to establish definitively what role the material had on the referendum result among the rest of the campaign &ldquo;noise&rdquo;.</span></p>
<p class="no_name" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 1.5em; color: rgb(81, 81, 81); font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px;">
	<span style="color:#000000;">Ms Jordan also contended that that the ruling of the Supreme Court on November, 8th, 2012, two days before polling day, should have been followed by emergency legislation to postpone the polling day.</span></p>
<p class="no_name" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 1.5em; color: rgb(81, 81, 81); font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px;">
	<span style="color:#000000;">Additionally she argued the respondents did not attempt to remedy the breaches of the Constitution identified by the Supreme Court.</span></p>
<p class="no_name" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 1.5em; color: rgb(81, 81, 81); font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px;">
	<span style="color:#000000;">Mr Justice McDermott said he had considerable doubt whether the jurisdiction of the court extended to a review of a Government&rsquo;s failure to introduce emergency legislation. Pointing to Government moves to pull campaign advertising and edit its website after the Supreme Court ruling, he also rejected the claim that any Minister or the Government interfered with the constitutional rights of citizens or the democratic process.</span></p>
<p class="no_name" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 1.5em; color: rgb(81, 81, 81); font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px;">
	<span style="color:#000000;">The judge ruled the evidence adduced by the petitioner had established a fair bona fide or serious issue to be tried on the grounds set out in the petition and, therefore, he granted her leave to present the petition.</span></p>
<p class="no_name" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 1.5em; color: rgb(81, 81, 81); font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px;">
	<span style="color:#000000;">However he was not satisfied that on the balance of probabilities she succeeded in establishing the grounds for the referendum result to be overruled. Thus, he dismissed the petition.</span></p>
<p class="no_name" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 1.5em; color: rgb(81, 81, 81); font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px;">
	<a href="http://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/high-court-rejects-attempt-to-have-children-s-referendum-result-annulled-1.1588525?page=2"><span style="color:#000000;">http://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/high-court-rejects-attempt-to-have-children-s-referendum-result-annulled-1.1588525?page=</span></a><span style="color:#000000;">1</span></p>
